Archive for January, 2006
Was Socrates right to take his deathly drink?
Sunday, January 22nd, 200610:43 pm
Was Socrates right to take his deathly drink?
Do I know that I am because I know that I think?
How can it be known (without assuming) how truth is known?
Is it greater to exist in reality than in the mind alone?
Is this the only real universe, or is there another?
If it must first pass into non-existence, […]
God does not exist in that “God” is logically impossible
Tuesday, January 10th, 200611:33 pm
Regarding Anslem’s Ontological Argument for the existence of God, perhaps the important thing to look at is what is meant by “God existing in the mind.” The atheist must admit that he has an idea of ‘God’ in his mind when he denies God’s existence, but in what sense does God exist in his mind? […]
Puddles
Sunday, January 8th, 200612:27 am
“The undersigned persons think it needless to touch on a kindred problem so often discussed at committees for university reform; the question of whether dons see double because they are drunk or get drunk because they see double. It is enough for them (the undersigned persons) if they are able to pursue their own peculiar […]
God Does Not Exist
Friday, January 6th, 200611:32 pm
What with the new year passing and the old one just beginning, the time has come for a revived discussion of Anselm’s Ontological Argument for the existence of God. There is a fairly easy way to explain this argument. I, however, have no idea what this is and so will explain it a different way.
Let […]